Do the 4 P’s of Marketing Still Matter?

2008 April 7
by Ivana Taylor

4217821706 Over the last few weeks I’ve gotten a little further engrossed in the new shiny thing that is online marketing and community.  I’ve been exploring twitter (that’s been fun).  I’ve been reading blog posts on the pros and cons of social networking (like this great one by Chris Brogan).  And this morning, I’m wondering whatever happened to those 4 P’s we learned about and read about.

Is the Marketing Mix Still Relevant?

I say the short answer is yes – but not in the same way as before.  In fact, I’ve re-named the traditional 4 P’s for myself years ago.

  • Product = Offering.  Because that’s what it is; it’s the combination of the tangible, intangible, people and experience that we offer to our clients that we have to manage.  It’s the offering which drives price and value and not the actual widget or service.
  • Place = Distribution.  This is being at arm’s length to your customer.  That might mean a direct sales rep, it might be a web site, it might be who knows what this week.  But the key is to be at arm’s length so that you can provide an offering with value and they can give you money for it.
  • Price = Trade Value.  This is what it’s worth to have that experience.  Like life itself, it’s flexible and changing.  Just Bought Rafi Muhammed’s Pricing for Profit Book and can’t wait to dig into that tasty treat.
  • Promotion = Relationship.  I just changed this from communication, and I struggled with whether I should use community.  But you get the point.  It isn’t about advertising or promotion in the traditional sense, it’s about communicating value and building lasting, loyal profitable relationships.  You can use ads or direct marketing, but you can use social networks, web, people, events, and so many more things.

So have you done some tweaking of the 4 P’s yourself?  Let me hear you.

4 Responses leave one →
  1. April 7, 2008

    I don’t know the marketing person’s point of view, as I’m a technologist who loves people. But here’s my thought: they matter, but the definitions have shifted a great deal. I think that’s the big difference. But that big difference is bigger than what immediately comes to mind. Sounds cryptic, but I promise that THIS is the big seed hiding inside the old oak.

  2. April 7, 2008

    See – I think so too. The basics will always matter, yet I think it’s this coming to grips with how to correctly manage these elements in our strategy that can get tricky.

  3. April 24, 2008

    Wow great! Some of your traits are enlighten to carry, no matter how difficult the job is. Also, publish very good affiliate company internet marketing statistics. This will help me find out what is working and what is not.

  4. Khaled permalink
    October 8, 2008

    How to explain the four P model for a company (ex: Google) that is offering product/service (ex: search service) for free and earning all the money through advertising. Do they really mixing up these four components?

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS