<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customer Loyalty Requires Authenticity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategystew.com/2008/09/04/customer-loyalty-requires-authenticity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategystew.com/2008/09/04/customer-loyalty-requires-authenticity/</link>
	<description>Practical Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:46:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bizowner</title>
		<link>http://www.strategystew.com/2008/09/04/customer-loyalty-requires-authenticity/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>bizowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategystew.com/?p=25#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting take, Ivana.  Not much of a political person, but McCain&#039;s choice struck me as so unorthodox and in a way risky -- not safe and carefully calculated -- it seems vintage McCain.  We ARE seeing the real candidate there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take, Ivana.  Not much of a political person, but McCain&#8217;s choice struck me as so unorthodox and in a way risky &#8212; not safe and carefully calculated &#8212; it seems vintage McCain.  We ARE seeing the real candidate there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivana Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.strategystew.com/2008/09/04/customer-loyalty-requires-authenticity/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivana Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategystew.com/?p=25#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I&#039;d like to have all &quot;marketing&quot; messages eliminated from the process - that includes radio and TV ads.  What I would love to see instead is that every candidate has to fill out a standard form that outlines (in writing) their position and action plan.  This informtion would then be mailed to every citisen/household/voter for review.  I would also make it mandatory that each candidate fills this out WITHOUT assistance from any consultant - other than their spouce :)  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If people - then - want to comment and analyze, they would be free to do that.  But what&#039;s written is sent to voters and that&#039;s that.  In fact, I would put those candidates in a room to fill the thing out - just like one of those employment tests they do for execs.  Yes - then we would have an industrial psychologist analyze the results and write a report - which is included in the packet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NOW - we can vote - and save our valuable TV entertainment time and political donations for truly important things (insert what you think is important here)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;d like to have all &#8220;marketing&#8221; messages eliminated from the process &#8211; that includes radio and TV ads.  What I would love to see instead is that every candidate has to fill out a standard form that outlines (in writing) their position and action plan.  This informtion would then be mailed to every citisen/household/voter for review.  I would also make it mandatory that each candidate fills this out WITHOUT assistance from any consultant &#8211; other than their spouce <img src='http://www.strategystew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>If people &#8211; then &#8211; want to comment and analyze, they would be free to do that.  But what&#8217;s written is sent to voters and that&#8217;s that.  In fact, I would put those candidates in a room to fill the thing out &#8211; just like one of those employment tests they do for execs.  Yes &#8211; then we would have an industrial psychologist analyze the results and write a report &#8211; which is included in the packet.</p>
<p>NOW &#8211; we can vote &#8211; and save our valuable TV entertainment time and political donations for truly important things (insert what you think is important here)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.strategystew.com/2008/09/04/customer-loyalty-requires-authenticity/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategystew.com/?p=25#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ivana.. funny, I am feeling that this election in particular we are seeing something different... history making opportunities almost force authenticity in my opinion.  There is so much at stake on both sides that I think we will see more and more authenticity and it won&#039;t always be &quot;pretty&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I personally am ONLY focusing on listening to what the TOP 4 (pres noms and vp noms)have to say, not news commentators or anyone else.  As for the issues, I will look at the &quot;party&quot; platforms not depend on speeches or what the &quot;experts&quot; have to say.  :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivana.. funny, I am feeling that this election in particular we are seeing something different&#8230; history making opportunities almost force authenticity in my opinion.  There is so much at stake on both sides that I think we will see more and more authenticity and it won&#8217;t always be &#8220;pretty&#8221;.</p>
<p>I personally am ONLY focusing on listening to what the TOP 4 (pres noms and vp noms)have to say, not news commentators or anyone else.  As for the issues, I will look at the &#8220;party&#8221; platforms not depend on speeches or what the &#8220;experts&#8221; have to say.  <img src='http://www.strategystew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
